Voorbeelden van laag-contextueel denken/en: verschil tussen versies
Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met '== Positive consequences ==' Labels: Bewerking via mobiel Bewerking via mobiele website |
Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met 'A woman thinks her husband will like it if she unexpectedly passes by his work with the children. She does not take into account that the children (with autism) have to sit in the car for an hour during rush hour and arrive completely overstimulated. The result: children and mother overstimulated, husband has to stop work to save the situation. The intention was good, the effect was not.' |
||
| Regel 44: | Regel 44: | ||
* difficulty with long-term consequences of actions | * difficulty with long-term consequences of actions | ||
* difficulty with the sensitivities of others | * difficulty with the sensitivities of others | ||
* starting point = own conclusions (first-degree thinking) | * starting point = own conclusions (first-degree thinking) | ||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|A woman thinks her husband will like it if she unexpectedly passes by his work with the children. | ||
She does not take into account that the children (with autism) have to sit in the car for an hour during rush hour and arrive completely overstimulated. | |||
The result: children and mother overstimulated, husband has to stop work to save the situation. The intention was good, the effect was not.}} | |||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|You raise your voice to get attention or to push your point through. | ||
You do not realize that this is unpleasant for the other person and that you are missing important information. | |||
In the long run, this leads either to shouting matches or to avoiding conversations altogether.}} | |||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|Interrupting a conversation to share your own idea immediately. | ||
This ignores the sensitivities of the other person and can cause irritation or disengagement.}} | |||
<span id="Transactioneel_handelen"></span> | <span id="Transactioneel_handelen"></span> | ||
| Regel 61: | Regel 61: | ||
"I do X, so that you do Y". | "I do X, so that you do Y". | ||
The nuance or underlying reciprocity disappears in favor of direct exchange. | The nuance or underlying reciprocity disappears in favor of direct exchange. | ||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|A low-contextual person gives criticism. Later, the other person does something unexpected (e.g. not emptying the dishwasher). | ||
The first thinks: "that is a reaction to my criticism." No account is taken of context such as forgetfulness or being distracted.}} | |||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|A partner accuses you of infidelity because he/she reasons transactionally: | ||
" | "you do something → that means X, because that’s how it works for me."}} | ||
{{Casus| | {{Casus|A woman lets the air out of her husband’s bicycle tires so that he has to take the car. | ||
This way he takes their son with him, and she does not have to bring him to school.}} | |||