Skip to content

Black-and-white thinking and obsessions: very strong first-degree thinking

To relativize events, you need context. Those who lack that ability often get stuck in their first thought or conviction. We call that very strong first-degree thinking.
Very strong first-degree thinking
Very strong first-degree thinking

Very strong first-degree thinking

To relativize events, you need context. Those who lack that ability often get stuck in their first thought or conviction. We call that very strong first-degree thinking.

It's a continuum: from rigid convictions, to obsessive thoughts, to psychotic experiences, and ultimately schizophrenia.

Rigidity and fixed beliefs

At a very strong first-degree thinking, the first interpretation is repeatedly confirmed. Examples:

From rigidity to obsessive thoughts

If rigidity gets stronger, obsessive thoughts arise. Examples:

To Psychosis and Schizophrenia

When the compulsion gets too strong, reality itself can begin to distort.

This fits research on the predictive brain. Fletcher and Frith (2009) explain delusions and hallucinations as a derailment in weighing expectation against what the senses bring in.2 The brain then relies too much on its own expectations and too little on the situation. Chance events thus acquire a meaning they do not have.

Liddle and Liddle (2022) regard this imprecise prediction as the core of classical schizophrenia.3 Of all conditions, the evidence for such a mechanism is most developed here. That context processing is its cause, however, remains a hypothesis.4

Summary

Very strong first-degree thinking can therefore lead to a sliding scale: from rigid convictions → to obsessive thoughts → to psychosis → and ultimately schizophrenia.

The common factor is the lack of context sensitivity, which causes someone to get stuck further and further in a one-sided interpretation of reality.

References

  1. Fradkin, I., Adams, R. A., Parr, T., Roiser, J. P., & Huppert, J. D. (2020). Searching for an anchor in an unpredictable world: A computational model of obsessive compulsive disorder. Psychological Review, 127(5), 672–699. doi:10.1037/rev0000188 — PubMed 32105115
  2. Fletcher, P. C., & Frith, C. D. (2009). Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 48–58. doi:10.1038/nrn2536 — PubMed 19050712
  3. Liddle, P. F., & Liddle, E. B. (2022). Imprecise predictive coding is at the core of classical schizophrenia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 818711. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.818711 — PubMed 35308615
  4. Thomeer, K., & Vermeulen, P. (2026). Tussen de regels lezen: contextverwerking en psychische kwetsbaarheid. In-Mind, 02/2026. In-Mind