Autism and context blindness

The term context blindness was originally developed to describe the core problem of autism (Peter Vermeulen, 2011). Autistic individuals often have difficulty using contextual information when interpreting signals and events.
Autism in the DSM
In the DSM-5, autism is described as a disorder with:
- limitations in social communication and interaction
- limited, repetitive behaviors or interests
Important to emphasize: the DSM is a classification system, not an explanatory model. The label autism only describes a cluster of behaviors and experiences, but says nothing about the unique person.
A well-known saying summarizes this well: If you know one person with autism, you know one person with autism.
Reframing from the perspective of contextual thinking
Within this project, we see autism not merely as a disorder, but as a variant in thinking style:
- low context sensitivity (strongly detail-oriented, difficulty with cohesion and implicit signals)
- strengths in accuracy and detail perception
- vulnerabilities in relationships, flexibility, and basic trust
Examples of context blindness in autism
- Literal interpretation of language ("the train is delayed" → looking at the vehicle instead of the timetable).
- Difficulty framing other people's emotions without explicit explanation.
- Sensory overload due to noise or social pressure, because filtering irrelevant stimuli is difficult.
Spectrum and overlap
Autism shows overlap with other context-related vulnerabilities:
- personality disorders (rigidity, basic trust)
- psychoses (when overload leads to reality problems)
- depression and burnout (due to constant overcompensation in a complex world)
De Bruin's eight disturbances
Colette de Bruin describes in Dit is autisme (2017, 4th ed. 2023) eight information processing disturbances that accompany autism. From a Context Thinking perspective, they can be read as eight manifestations of context blindness:
- Processing information in fragments — the trees, not the forest.
- Not recognizing social information — emotional and implicit signals are missed.
- Making incorrect connections — cause-and-effect relationships are stored incorrectly.
- Over- or under-reacting — sensory stimuli are insufficiently filtered.
- Difficulty with meaning-making — literal interpretation, longer processing time.
- Storing information chaotically — retrieval costs disproportionately much energy.
- Missing frames of reference — insufficiently developed social and factual frameworks.
- Not discarding information — working memory fills up due to lack of automatic filtering.
The common denominator: each of these disturbances is understandable as a manifestation of reduced context integration. The disturbances are the cause; context blindness is the cognitive consequence — two complementary descriptions of the same phenomenon.
De Bruin also proposed the CASS (Circle of Autism Spectrum Symptoms) as an alternative to the linear spectrum model: autism is not a point on a line, but a multidimensional profile. See The multidimensional profile for the full elaboration.
Note
The eight disturbances are a practical framework by De Bruin, not a scientifically validated diagnostic model. Source: Bruin, C. de & Naber, F.B.A. (2023). Dit is autisme. Van hersenwerking tot gedrag (4th ed.). Doetinchem: High 5 Publishers.
Conclusion
Autism can be understood as an extreme form of low-contextual thinking. Classifying it as a "disorder" helps in healthcare practice but should not be confused with an explanation or with the person themselves. Every person with autism is unique, with their own strengths, vulnerabilities, and ways of dealing with context.