Autism and context blindness

Autism is an extreme form of low-contextual thinking: stimuli, emotions and language are processed literally and fragmentarily. The term context blindness describes the core problem. Every person with autism is unique — the DSM label is a tool, not an explanation.
Sensory intensity: every detail equally sharp and present
For a low-context thinker, every detail is equally prominent — there is no automatic filtering of what is relevant in a given situation.

The term context blindness was originally developed to describe the core problem of autism (Peter Vermeulen, 2011). Autistic individuals often have difficulty using contextual information when interpreting signals and events.

Autism in the DSM

In the DSM-5, autism is described as a disorder with:

Important to emphasize: the DSM is a classification system, not an explanatory model. The label autism only describes a cluster of behaviors and experiences, but says nothing about the unique person.

A well-known saying summarizes this well: If you know one person with autism, you know one person with autism.

Note: In the literature and popular imagination, "typical" characteristics of autism are often mentioned, such as honesty or straightforwardness. Although this is sometimes true, it is not a general rule. People with autism can also lie, for example — often as a coping mechanism to compensate for their context blindness. This illustrates a broader critique of the DSM classifications: they create types and clusters, but do not capture the complexity and uniqueness of the person.

Reframing from the perspective of contextual thinking

Within this project, we see autism not merely as a disorder, but as a variant in thinking style:

Examples of context blindness in autism

Spectrum and overlap

Autism shows overlap with other context-related vulnerabilities:

De Bruin's eight disturbances

Colette de Bruin describes in Dit is autisme (2017, 4th ed. 2023) eight information processing disturbances that accompany autism. From a Context Thinking perspective, they can be read as eight manifestations of context blindness:

The common denominator: each of these disturbances is understandable as a manifestation of reduced context integration. The disturbances are the cause; context blindness is the cognitive consequence — two complementary descriptions of the same phenomenon.

De Bruin also proposed the CASS (Circle of Autism Spectrum Symptoms) as an alternative to the linear spectrum model: autism is not a point on a line, but a multidimensional profile. See The multidimensional profile for the full elaboration.

Note

The eight disturbances are a practical framework by De Bruin, not a scientifically validated diagnostic model. Source: Bruin, C. de & Naber, F.B.A. (2023). Dit is autisme. Van hersenwerking tot gedrag (4th ed.). Doetinchem: High 5 Publishers.

Conclusion

Autism can be understood as an extreme form of low-contextual thinking. Classifying it as a "disorder" helps in healthcare practice but should not be confused with an explanation or with the person themselves. Every person with autism is unique, with their own strengths, vulnerabilities, and ways of dealing with context.